The Hechinger Study is a national nonprofit newsroom that reports on one topic: education. Sign upwardly for our weekly newsletters to get stories like this delivered directly to your inbox.

Now that spring is finally here, kids cooped up during this specially brutal winter might be looking forward to enjoying some sunshine. Many will have to control the wiggles a trivial longer, though. Information technology's standardized testing flavour, which ways silent hallways, desks arranged in rows, and for many kids, a lot of feet until it's over.

Now that the tests in many states are getting harder in order to align with the new Common Cadre standards and being used to grade teachers, not simply students, they're also producing a lot of anxiety amongst parents and teachers, likewise. In response to the added pressure this year, a move confronting standardized testing is gathering steam as some parents decide to let their children opt out of the tests.

Their motion may not stop the use of the tests. But information technology does raise the question of whether the resisters have a point.

standardized tests pros and cons
Photo by Biological science Corner

The Hechinger Report asked parents who are pulling their kids out of the tests to explain the reasons they did so. And so we asked Sandi Jacobs, vice president of the National Council on Teacher Quality, which supports the use of standardized tests to evaluate teachers, to make an argument for why kids shouldn't opt out of tests.

Hither's what parents in favor of opting out said:

ane) The tests don't actually measure the skills we want students to acquire, such as disquisitional thinking, creativity and complex problem solving. Latoshia Wheeler, a piece of work-at-home mom of 3, has led an opt-out movement at her third grader'south school, the Riverdale Avenue Customs Schoolhouse in Brownsville, a low-income neighborhood in Brooklyn. Ninety percent of the students receive free lunch, a measure of poverty, and 94 percent are black or Hispanic. Wheeler estimates merely ii or three students will take the tests this yr in the third grade. The rest have opted out.

Instead of multiple-option exams, Wheeler says she wishes the state tests could be modeled on the portfolios of class work and projects her high schoolhouse-age daughter turns in twice a year. "That teaches them how to express themselves. They can see where they grew," she said. "That'southward more than on the lines of critical thinking. That makes you desire to do improve, and I merely experience like kids acquire more from experience."

2) The tests aren't reliable measures of how much students know and how well teachers can teach. Liz Rosenberg is the parent of a fourth grader at the Brooklyn New School, a school with a sizeable middle and upper eye class population. A group of New Schoolhouse parents announced on Tuesday that 80 per centum of students in testing grades were opting out of the tests this year. "There'south very footling reason to accept faith in the tests," Rosenberg, who works equally a teacher trainer, said.

"All you get is one piddling score. You really get no information about your child," she added. "You lot get no information about what information technology is they practise well. What it is they need to work on."

3) Schools spend as well much time prepping for mediocre, unreliable exams, especially at struggling schools where students could do good from more enrichment. Wheeler says her son's school does not offering art or music to students, and that they rarely go on field trips. She says the focus on the math and English tests as well takes abroad time from the other core subjects of science and of social studies.

"All they do is teach them to take a examination. You should teach a child to learn," she said. "In that location's and so much that'south missing."

Although many educators and officials acknowledge the tests aren't perfect, in New York, state and metropolis education officials have urged families like the Rosenbergs and the Wheelers not to opt out. We asked Jacobs why students should stick with the exams.

one) The tests are nearly to become better, now that Common Cadre aligned tests are rolling out next year in many states. The new tests volition have bug that ask students to exercise more than choice an answer from a list of 4 choices. For example, the English tests adult past two testing consortia include questions that may ask students to pick more than ane reply or inquire them to highlight of import points in a text. They also include brusk essay questions. The new math tests in some cases allow students to write out formulas or manipulate shapes on a figurer screen.

Simply Jacobs said i reason many parents are frustrated is that the tests haven't caught upwards with the new standards existence taught in schools yet. "At that place's a very valid business concern that they're non well aligned with the standards that are in place," she said. "That should change in the very well-nigh future. I think that frustration is real, at the same fourth dimension, it's part of the process."

two) The tests may not reveal everything about how much a educatee has learned, merely they're an important element of a more holistic picture of pupil performance. Proponents of the tests, and of the instructor evaluations now fastened to them, normally argue that the tests should exist one piece of an evaluation of student functioning that includes formative tests, too, and that teachers should besides exist graded on classroom observations and lesson planning.

"The thought that assessment isn't an important part of didactics and learning, I'm not certain how the chat got to this signal where nosotros seemed to lost sight that anything a instructor knows virtually her students is because she measured it some manner," Jacobs said.

iii) The tests show how unequal the school organisation is, and identify which schools need more assistance and resource because their students are falling backside. Standardized tests have been the main mode educators, experts and policymakers have measured the achievement gap between low-income and minority children and their wealthier, white peers. And knowing how big the gap is has prompted more urgency in the effort to close it.

"I haven't seen annihilation that suggests that we're at a point in the opt out movement where we're skewing the data. If information technology was to get real legs and nosotros saw big groups of kids not taking the test, then I think nosotros do accept an equity upshot," Jacobs said. "The results of the tests are some of the best markers nosotros have to help identify those equity bug."

Which statement is more than convincing? Latoshia Wheeler, for her part, was still adamant there is a amend way than standardized exams.

"I don't want to put my son through whatever of that to show that we need resources. You could live a day in the life of a Brownsville educatee and find out we demand resources," she said. "The test shows inequity in teaching. I agree with that. Just that'southward not a reason to exercise it."

The Hechinger Report provides in-depth, fact-based, unbiased reporting on education that is costless to all readers. But that doesn't hateful it'southward free to produce. Our work keeps educators and the public informed most pressing problems at schools and on campuses throughout the state. We tell the whole story, fifty-fifty when the details are inconvenient. Help us keep doing that.

Join us today.

Sarah Garland oversees editorial planning and budgeting, edits K-12 stories and manages editorial partnerships with other news outlets. She has worked at Hechinger since 2010, and before that wrote near...